Search
Search
News
Multimedia
Sports
Arts & Culture
Opinion
Subscribe
Life & Times
Fine Arts
Features
Send a News Tip
100 Years
Archive
Advertise
Donate

Subscribeto The Echo

The Echo

Saturday, May 28, 2022 Print Edition

Donate

  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Arts & Culture
  • Life & Times
  • Features
  • Fine Arts
  • Multimedia
  • Archive
  • 100 Years
  • Advertise
  • Send a Tip
  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Arts & Culture
  • Life & Times
  • Features
  • Fine Arts
  • Multimedia
  • Archive
  • 100 Years
  • Advertise
  • Send a News Tip
Search

Subscribe

Subscribe to The Echo

The Echo aims to represent the views of diverse voices on Taylor University's campus fairly and without bias and to be a vehicle of accurate and pertinent information to the student body. The Echo also aims to be a forum that fosters healthy discussion about relevant issues, acting as a catalyst for change on our campus.

Fill out my online form.

5/2/2022, 12:30pm

Challenge others in your community

Iron sharpens iron

By Jakob Miller

Share

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Mail
  • Print

In one notable study, researchers played clips from a football game to fans. To no one’s surprise, calls by the referee for their team were seen as right and fair. Calls against their team? The referee was blind — or bribed.

That dishonesty is harmless in sports, but we’re about to have a more consequential matchup: midterm elections will be here before you know it. With an incoming blizzard of political information inbound, how can we avoid bias?

All too often, we assume we can reason or learn our way out. Another article, another podcast, getting better at the science: that will save us from self-deception. Research doesn’t back this up, however, the better someone’s math skills, the more likely they are to make errors in their party’s favor when asked to review budget proposals. 

Julia Galef, in “The Scout Mindset,” writes that  we have two goals when deciding to accept a new piece of information (whether we’re aware of it or not). The first is an accuracy goal — is this actually true? The second, however, is a consistency goal — does this fit with what we already believe to be true? 

That first goal is external — subjecting our political beliefs to the outside world. The second goal is internal and self-serving: does believing this save me from having to change my mind, admit I might have been wrong? James Druckman, an American political scientist, and others find that we seek self-serving comfortable consistency far more often than we seek truth. No wonder better math skills increase errors, as in Jeremiah 17:9, our hearts deceive us. 

So are we doomed? Absolutely not. Scripture and science are in agreement on the solution: community with others. Druckman finds that when people are told they’ll have to discuss their answers with others, they become dramatically more accuracy seeking and far less biased. Thinking about others helps remove our focus from ourselves. Nor is this a call for us to ice-skate over the conversational abyss of politics on a crust of false politeness. James Evans, a sociologist, found that groups of people that had strong, honest political disagreements vastly outperformed groups that were in total agreement at cognitive tasks. Being around people we don’t agree with makes us better. Haidt points out that stress from disagreeing with friends has positive psychological benefits,what he calls antifragility. As Proverbs 27:6 puts it, “Faithful are the wounds of a friend...” 

So this election, talk politics with someone who might not agree with you. When they challenge you, thank them for dealing a faithful wound to your ego — and do them that same service. Above all, love them no matter what side they’re on. After all, "Iron sharpeneth iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend." (Proverbs 27:17)

Share



Related Stories

The Women's Giving Circle contributes significantly to Taylor scholarships.

Women’s Giving Circle supports students, faculty

By Amelia Bostick

Unknown-1.jpeg

Meet opinions editor, Sophia King

By Sophia King

On the 22nd, students in the class “Introduction to American Government and Environmental Law” visited the Indiana Statehouse. Students met and spoke with Rep. Renee Pack (Democrat) and Rep. Thomas Saunders (Republican.)

Avoiding 'us vs. them'

By Jakob Miller


Most Popular


5/9/2022, 11:00am

New gas station fills vacant spot

By Payne Moses

Owners hope to bring new offerings


4/28/2022, 6:10pm

U.S. Supreme Court decides to not hear Gordon lawsuit for now


5/16/2022, 1:00pm

Taylor University prepares for 2022 commencement


5/16/2022, 1:00pm

Faded tradition revisited by Taylor alumnus


The Echo To Homepage
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Covers
  • Awards
  • Get Involved

All Rights Reserved

© Copyright 2022 The Echo

Powered by
Solutions by The State News.

Taylor University